WebFeb 28, 2015 · In Dashrath Roop Singh Rathore, the SC on 1 st August 2014, concluded that the “ offence in contemplation of Section 138 of the NI Act was the dishonor of the … WebOct 28, 2024 · BRIEF FACTS: 1. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 12 January 2024 of the High Court of Gujarat. The High Court dismissed an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 30 August 2016 by which the first respondent was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 .
15 landmark judgment on section 138 Negotiable Instrument
WebMay 22, 2015 · It cannot be contested that Dashrath Rup Singh judgment has been welcomed by the criminal justice system at the Magistrate’s level of this country which is … WebBhaskaran's case was heard by a two-judge Bench of this Court who took the view that the jurisdiction to try an offence under Section 138 could not be determined only by … sids psychology definition
DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHORE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – …
WebHowever after the judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court of India in case titled as "Dashrath Roop Singh Rathod Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr", the matter was returned for filing in the jurisdiction of Faridabad court, Haryana where after perusal of material on record, prima facie case was made out and cognizance was taken by the court of Ld. … WebHon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Dashrath Roop Singh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others", Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009, the trial of the offence must be logically restricted to the place where drawee bank is located and in the WebDashrath Rupsingh Rathod Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. Once the cause of action accrues to the complainant, the jurisdiction of the Court to try the case will be determined … the port hamilton